|
SURVEY:
EMPLOYEES SUE ONE IN FOUR PRIVATE COMPANIES
More
than one in four (26%) privately held companies has faced
litigation by an employee or former employee in the past
few years, according to a nationwide survey sponsored by
the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies.
The Chubb 2004 Private Company Risk Survey found that
executives at 44% of the firms surveyed say it's likely
that an employee will sue them, their board members,
and/or their company this year. One in two respondents
(50%) expect their company to face a discrimination
complaint lodged with federal or state authorities.
More than half the respondents estimated that it would
cost more than $100,000 to settle an employment
discrimination or harassment lawsuit; ten percent said it
would cost at least $1 million. "Executives at many
private companies realize that they're vulnerable to
lawsuits from employees and former employees," says
Lisa McGee, Chubb & Son Private Company Customer Group
manager. "They are concerned, and rightly so, about
the cost to defend against these lawsuits and the
potential losses."
According to the survey, private companies are also
concerned about lawsuits from retired employees. Nearly
one in four respondents believe that a retiree will sue
the company, its directors and officers, and/or its
benefits plan administrators, and fiduciaries this year.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
makes fiduciaries personally liable for losses to benefit
plans incurred as a result of their breach of duties. The
most frequent charges against fiduciaries include denial
or change of benefits, administrative error, incorrect
benefit calculation, improper advice or counsel,
misleading representation, and wrongful termination of a
plan.
The study found that many private companies are taking
steps to lower their risks and reduce potential losses.
Forty percent of the companies surveyed bought Employment
Practices Liability insurance (EPLI), while 24% purchased
Fiduciary Liability insurance. In addition, 72% of
companies surveyed have written policies banning
employment discrimination and sexual harassment, and 52%
offer employment discrimination and/or sexual harassment
training.
Impulse Research Corp (Los Angeles) conducted the
survey, interviewing the CEO, CFO, and other top managers
of 300 privately held companies. To learn more, go to www.chubb/news/pr20040525.html.
|
|
EMPLOYMENT
PRACTICES LIABILITY JURY AWARDS: UP, UP, AND AWAY!
If
the last article weren't enough to encourage buying EPLI,
consider this: The national median compensatory jury-award
median for employment-practice liability cases (which
include discrimination and wrongful termination claims) rose
18% in 2003 to $250,000! The median compensatory award for
discrimination cases (which involve age, race, disability,
or sex discrimination) during the same period fell 2%
to $232,322.
According to Employment Practice Liability:
Jury Award Trends and Statistics 2004 Edition, a report by Jury
Verdict Research (JVR), the median jury award for
employment-practice cases has increased significantly during
the past two reporting years. What's more, age
discrimination and disability discrimination plaintiffs
received the most compensation from juries over the
seven-year period studied. JVR maintains a nationwide
database of more than 239,000 plaintiff and defense
verdicts, and settlements. To purchase the entire report, click
here.
More employers are waking up to the need for EPLI.
Although there's no such thing as eliminating all risks,
it's wise to at least keep them under control. Fortunately,
unlike many other insurance policies, the cost of EPLI is
holding fairly steady.
Hardest hit are businesses with existing losses or
reductions in force. Insurance companies are trying to keep
the product profitable and affordable by increasing
retentions (usually to a minimum of $25,000), specifically
excluding wage and hour claims, and becoming increasingly
hard-nosed about choosing their panel counsel.
To learn more about EPLI, contact your insurance agent or
broker and check out the Form of the Month: Employment
Practices Liability Insurance Worksheet.
|
|
THE
LESS YOU CONTROL, THE MORE YOU'LL ACCOMPLISH!
The
success of any executive is directly proportional to their
ability to work in their highest and best use. The
delegation of all other activities is a must. Here's an
approach to take:
- Begin by defining exactly what it is that
you're doing and, just as important, how you do it
. Reduce the "what and how" to writing.
This is your personal SOP;
- Define which of your tasks are your
value-added/highest and best use activities.
Eliminate wasteful activities from your plate and
delegate or outsource administrative tasks;
- Don't expect employees to do the job as well
as you. As Ken Blanchard states: A strategic
objective done 80% well by a subordinate is better
than one not done at all by you! Expect the person who
gets the new duties to make mistakes. After all,
that's how you learned. Reduce the propensity to error
through training, standard operating procedures, and
incentives. It's understandable if employees make a
mistake the first time. It's not understandable if
they keep making it;
- Take small steps. Divide the delegated
assignments and don't expect people to master them all
at once. Using this approach will help employees build
their confidence, and they'll be increasingly willing
to take on new projects;
- Realize that for the employee to take on new
work, they, too, have to delegate some of their work .
Have them determine which of their activities add
value, which are purely administrative, and which are
wasteful and to whom they can delegate the latter two
types of tasks;
- Don't allow "gotta minutes?"
to eat up your time. If you're
delegating a matter, encourage the employee to figure
out any challenges themselves before coming to you.
Limit their inquiries during the day to emergency
issues only. Have them ask all other questions at
regularly scheduled meetings
- Give feedback on their performance.
In the beginning, focus on rewarding their effort, not
their results. Once they gain experience and their
confidence has grown, you can critique results.
|
|
KEEP
YOUR BALANCE RIGHT
The
Balance Scorecard, introduced by Kaplan and Norton in
1992, provides a management tool that measures four
perspectives of organizational performance: Financial,
Customer, Internal
Business Processes, and Learning
and Growth. You can apply the scorecard to
overall company performance and to individuals and teams.
- Financial . What's your average
revenue per employee? As Dr. Deming would say, the
goal of any organization is the optimization of its
resources. For any employee to be worth more, they
must be able to do more with less. This doesn't
necessarily mean that they work harder or longer hours
— but that they work to their highest and best use
(see the article, "The Less You Control
…"). For example, how much time is your $100 an
hour employee spending on $25 an hour work? How much
time are your $25 an hour employees spending doing $10
an hour work? And so on.
- Customers. How well are you
servicing clients and customers? For some employees,
that customer might be an internal one. Are you and
your employees clear about understanding customer
needs and meeting them more effectively? We'd
recommend this approach: Have your workers ask a
number of customers what they think is going right
about the service they're receiving, what can go
better about customer service, and what else they
would like to share.
- Internal Business Processes. Whether
you call it workflow or standard operating procedures,
make sure that every employee understands the company
workflow. See to it that everyone who is affected by
these practices has input into them. Encourage
improvements, and capture your "best
practices" in writing. Remember, whether you call
it an SOP, process, or system, it doesn't exist and
can't be systematically improved unless you have it in
writing.
- Learning and Growth. To grow your
organization, focus your learning on finances,
customers, and procedures. Education is the greatest
form of leverage in any organization; it's almost
impossible to grow without it. When it comes to
managing this growth, stick within your competencies
without shutting off your cash flow in the process.
|
|
“I have always believed you can bring your heart to
work.”
Anita
Roddick,
Founder of Body Works
|
|
This issue discusses:
We’ve also provided hyperlinks to a free Form
of the Month.
|
|
|
|
WHAT
DOES YOUR RECRUITMENT MESSAGE SAY?

Savvy employers realize that a lot more goes into
recruitment ads than just an open job position. Your
classifieds and other recruitment messages present an
opportunity to "brand" your company in a way that
attracts only desired applicants and reinforces corporate
positioning. You can position your company as having a
diverse workforce, supporting family life, providing
extensive training, offering great pay, and so on. Take this
opportunity to identify the type of employee that you're
after (responsible, energetic, team players, etc.).
For example, many Circuit City (poster child of the book Good
to Great ) stores have a banner over their entrance
that says they're always hiring great employees. Think of
how that message impacts employees, customers, and potential
recruits. Visit the Company's Web
site and you'll see that they emphasize culture,
environment, opportunity, and location. It's hard to beat
that!
We've all seen messages on the back of trucks declaring
that they hire safe drivers. Why don't all trucking
companies have a similar message? Finally, consider In-N-Out
Burger. They know how important it is to "be cool"
and to pay a bit extra to the thousands of teenagers they
hire. Check out their recruitment Web
site.
How does your company stack up? How have we made
the work fun and challenging (whether we're running a fish
market, CPA firm, or widget factory)?
|
|
WORK,
DON'T SMOKE

To help slash rising medical costs, some companies are
not allowing smoking on any part of their property.
According to an article in the Arizona Republic, USAA, Lowes,
BF Goodrich Tires, and many hospital campuses have
implemented smoking bans. For many smokers, such a
zero-tolerance policy will mean giving up tobacco or
quitting the job. The American Cancer Society reports that
anticipated medical costs drop by $47 in the first year a
smoker quits and another $853 during the next seven years.
This does not include other costs, such as time spent away
from productive activity. Smokers miss 6.1 sick days per
year, compared with 3.8 days missed by non-smokers. Also, a
pack-a-day smoker spends about $1,500 a year on cigarettes
— money that they might otherwise invest in their
retirement plan.
The fact is, even though many employees enjoy smoking,
it's still an unhealthy and expensive habit that often
offends customers, clients, and employees who don't smoke.
For a great article about Workplace Smoking Policies, click
here.
|
|
CASES
OF THE MONTH
Our legal staff offers this review of top cases that
might affect your business.
(PDF)
(WORD)
|
|
FORM
OF THE MONTH:
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY
INSURANCE WORKSHEET
(PDF)
(Word)
This form, taken from the Special Report, "EPLI
(Employment Practices Liability Insurance): Understanding
the Exposure and Preventing Claims," lays out just
about every coverage issue that insurance companies consider
when writing EPLI. Make sure to use it when purchasing or
reviewing an EPLI policy.
|
For
more information on the contents of this newsletter,
please e-mail or give us a call.
The material presented here is general in nature.
Due to local and state laws and ordinances, an individual
article might not apply in every jurisdiction.
Copyright Employer
Advisors Network, Inc. 2004
|
Note: to access HR That Works! go to http://www.workcomppartners.com/HRTHATWORKS.htm
Click on the logIn button and use your designated Email address and
password. All the best, Frank Frank Pennachio Work Comp Partners
Specialists in Workers' Compensation Insurance 800-330-4745
www.workcomppartners.com
|