 |
|
Volume 4, Issue 10 October 2004
|
|
GIVING
REFERENCES: WATCH
WHAT YOU SAY!
Many
employers fear that a disgruntled former employee or future employer
might use any references they give against them later. To help
protect reluctant employers, many states have laws that give businesses
immunity from civil liability unless the plaintiff can
prove that the employer:
(1)
Knew that the information disclosed was false or misleading,
(2)
Disclosed this information with a reckless disregard for the truth,
or
(3)
Violated a specific disclosure provision of a state or federal
statute.
Unfortunately,
litigious former employees will argue these exceptions every time.
How
can you provide references that will protect you?
-
Make
sure that all references come through a single channel. You
don't want five different bosses and co-workers giving out
long-winded statements.
- Get the
departing employee to sign a Waiver Form. Use the
Post Employment Release of Employment Information form
(see the Forms of the Month). Then have it signed by the prospective
employer before you give a reference. You can blame the lawyers
for making you do this.
- If you
give a reference, stress the distinctions between opinion
and fact. Don't offer more than is asked for. If needed, take
and file notes of what you said, when, and to whom.
|
|
GETTING REFERENCES: THE
STRAIGHT SKINNY!
When
you're evaluating a new hire, the reluctance of their former employer
to provide candid references can make it difficult to get the information
you need:
- If you're
having difficulty obtaining a reference, use this Employee
Reference Request (see the Forms of the Month). Hopefully,
that will convince them it is "safe" to disclose information.
- If you still
can't get anything other than name, rank, and serial number, then
ask to speak to their spouse and close friends. Although at first
this might sound like a strange idea, our experience tells us
that you can get an enormous amount of valuable information. Remember
to ask our favorite question: "Did they ever tell you that anything
felt unfair to them at their last job?"
Most
importantly, don't give up! That's exactly what the wrong employee
hopes you will do!
|
|
THE LIMITATIONS OF LANGUAGE
In
his short, yet powerful book, "On
Dialogue," the late quantum physicist David Bohm explains that
language imposes a strong, subtle pressure to see the world as fragmented
and static. This outlook poses a challenge for leaders. For example,
when leaders use the phrase "quality," they're creating a mental
image that their managers and employees might not share. To move
past the limitations of language in our communications, we need
to include other people's "mind-maps" when conversing. This is what
a dialogue allows for. As semanticist Alfred Korzybski admonished,
"Whatever we say a thing is, it is not that. It is both different
from that and more than that."
Genuine
love and creative intelligence were the hallmarks of David Bohm's
life work. And they could be the starting point for the next wave
of growth at your company. What dialogue can you have around these
subjects? Can you think of a more compelling motivation for a profitable
bottom line at your company? To learn more about Bohm, we suggest
that you pick up a copy of his book, "On Dialogue," which can be
ordered through Amazon by clicking
here.
|
|
WORKFORCE REALITY
The
recent SHRM Workforce Diversity Conference identified nine distinct
themes. Here are our insights into each of them:
- Communication. Are your communications "inclusive"?
Do they reach out to the widest range of employees, or do they
focus only on the narrow few? Don't forget such informal communication
venues as the executive lunchroom.
- Measurement. Are your diversity numbers consistent
with the local population and your industry norms? Do you have
the same percentage of managers as rank and file employees in
the various "suspect" classifications? Remember, Coke, WalMart,
and many other companies faced discrimination lawsuits largely
due to numerical imbalances in hiring and promotion.
- Leadership. Are you helping women and minorities
break through the "glass ceiling"? What's the composition of your
leadership team? Are minorities given a career path to follow
should they wish to reach the top? Do you post management trainee
positions?
- Conflict Resolution. When conflict arises, does
your company ignore, bury, or deny it? Or, do you provide a safe
place for parties to communicate? Is there an ombudsperson or
some other "neutral" party for employees to go to who will listen
and help to iron out their differences?
- Disabilities. How proactive is your organization
in hiring the disabled? Statistics indicate that disabled employees
are quite loyal and have lower rates of absenteeism and turnover.
Also, many governmental agencies will provide financial assistance
for hiring them. If you're facing disability challenges, are you
taking advantage of such organizations as the Job Accommodation
Network (http://www.jan.wvu.edu/)?
- Cultural Competency. "Culture" can be defined
as how we collectively deal with our "stuff." To build a powerful
culture, you need to hire people who are trustworthy, get them
working in a shared direction, create safe places for communication,
and be very clear about your commitments. An empowering culture
gives employees something "larger" to focus on than the minor
differences between them.
- Team Building. One of the greatest challenges
in this area is assuming that everyone has the same concept of
"playing team." The chances are that they don't! Don't assume
anything. Gather your team commitments through consensus, put
them in writing, have people put their signature to it; and then
blow it up and put it on bulletin board sized posters so that
everybody can walk past it every day.
- Sexual Orientation. With more workers "coming
out of the closet" and with liberalized laws in this area, how
tolerant, or even accepting, is your organization? What is management
doing to help people move past their fears in this area?
- Aging Workforce. Last but not least is the "boomerang"
challenge. Are you allowing your older workers to become dinosaurs
or are you keeping them invigorated? Are you taking advantage
of their wisdom and placing them in mentoring roles or are you
allowing newer technologies to push them aside?
These
issues apply to any organization or business. Each is important,
even where a diverse workforce does not exist. To learn more about
the October conference, go to www.shrm.org/conferences/diversity.
|
|
ARE
ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS WORTH THE EFFORT?
A
recent article in Corporate Counsel magazine entitled
"Curb Your Enthusiasm" reveals that many companies are rejecting
the use of mandatory arbitration agreements. Their concerns include:
Increased expenses of arbitration, alienation of employees by requiring
them to sign the agreements, expanded rights of plaintiffs in employment
arbitration cases, the inability to file for summary judgment motion,
and the higher rate of plaintiff's success in arbitration. Finally,
it's very difficult to appeal an arbitration decision if the verdict
goes against the employer.
Of
course, many companies are still relying on these agreements. A
word of warning: If you use an arbitration agreement, explain to
employees why it benefits both parties, seek formal mediation before
going to arbitration, and take great care when picking your arbitrator.
To learn more, please read the White
Paper: Mediation and Arbitration.
|
“If
everybody concerned is absolutely clear about the goals and directives
and far purposes of the organization, practically all other questions
then become simple technical questions of fitting means to the ends.”
Abraham
Maslow, On Management
|
|
|
| This issue discusses:
We’ve also provided hyperlinks to (2) free Forms
of the Month.
|
| WORKING FROM HOME
Jet
Blue has approximately 700 reservation agents working from their
homes with company-supplied computers and phone lines. Jet Blue
President Dave Neeleman sees "home sourcing" as the answer to outsourcing
jobs overseas — even though call center operators are paid three
to four times the rate of workers in India and the Philippines.
An
article in the Los Angeles Times reported that almost
100,000 (or 70%) of Hewlett-Packard's employees do part of their
work from home and that AT&T has enjoyed more than $180 million
in operating benefit from tele-work. Today, nearly 24 million Americans
(16% of the labor force) are tele-workers: The same as the number
of self-employed who often work from home.
If
you're considering the use of at-home employees, we'd recommend
these guidelines:
-
Be clear on how home workers account for their time, activities,
and availability.
-
Acknowledge their obligation to work in an appropriate setting.
-
Have a written Tele-Commuting Agreement.
HR
That Works! users can look at the Tele-Commuting
Agreement on the Web site. If you don't have access to HR
That Works! and would like a copy of the agreement,
please send an e-mail
to HR That Works!
|
CASES OF THE MONTH
Our
legal staff offers this review of top cases that might affect your
business.
(PDF) (WORD)
|
| FORMS
OF THE MONTH:
Post
Employment Release of Employment Information
(PDF)
(Word)
Giving
references is a legal land mine. Most attorneys recommend giving
only a name, rank and serial number. This form will help protect
you from claims of slander, discrimination, breach of privacy, and
misrepresentation. Use this when giving a reference. Have it signed
by your ex-employee and the company making the inquiry.
Employee
Reference Request and Release
(PDF)
(WORD)
This
form is aimed at protecting you from conversations held during the
background and reference check process. This form is to be used
when you're asking for a reference. Have the job applicant sign
it when they give you their application.
|
|
The information presented here is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Due to local
and state laws and ordinances, an individual article might not
apply in every jurisdiction.
For more information on the contents of this newsletter, please
e-mail or give us a call.
Copyright Employer Advisors Network, Inc. 2004
|
|
|
Copyright © 2002 by WorkComp
Partners
215 East Main Street
Bartow, FL 33830
800.330.4745
FAX: 863.534.3562
E-mail: frank@workcomppartners.com
|
|
|
|